The Dr. Elaine Ma case is proof that Ontario is unfriendly to physicians

Last week, the Ontario Health Sector Appeal and Review Board (HSARB) denied the appeal by Dr. Elaine Ma in her fight against the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP). At the risk of upsetting Dr. Ma and many (all?) of my colleagues, that decision was actally legally appropriate. HSARB can’t actually look at whether a case is reasonable or not, their job is to go by what’s written in bulletins/updates. The real affront to physicians is that it should never ever have gotten here in the first place.The BackgroundHere is a condensed summary of what happened. It’s 2020. The COVID pandemic is raging. Ontario Premier Doug Ford appoints General Rick Hillier to oversee the COVID Vaccination program. He’s tasked with, as Ford calls it, “the largest vaccine rollout in a generation, a massive logistical undertaking, the likes of which this province has never seen.” Hillier’s stated goal? To get shots in everyone’s arms by August 2021.Dr. Elaine Ma from Kingston realizes the need to act quickly to help her community. She organizes outdoor mass vaccination clinics. More than 35,000 shots were given and Kingston became the most vaccinated area of the province. Dr. Ma was given an Award of Excellence by the Ontario College of Family Physicians for her efforts.Read: Local doctor lauded as pandemic hero now on OHIP’s hook for $600,000, ‘crickets’ from Ford government The Dispute with OHIPSo, what happened? For the COVID vaccine clinics, there were two sets of billing codes assigned. The first was a standard hourly rate. This was meant for physicians who attend a vaccine clinic and perform immunizations there. There were numerous such clinics set up by hospitals/public health/pharmacies and so on. Those agencies paid for the setup costs of those clinics. The physician just showed up and vaccinated.The second set of codes is used by physicians who give vaccinations in clinics they set up. These codes pay somewhat more, but they’re meant to compensate physicians for the fact that they have to cover all the overhead in those clinics.Dr. Ma would have had to make sure that things like electricians were hired to ensure that there was power and internet access outdoors. She may have needed to arrange for commercial grade outdoor tents. Propane heaters to heat the tents might have been needed. Some staff were paid, while others volunteered. All of this organizational work, and figuring out payments, needed to be done in advance. She did it.She therefore billed OHIP the second code. This is entirely reasonable given the circumstances and the work she did.What happened?The sudden increase in billings did not go unnoticed by OHIP and was flagged. This is absolutely appropriate. As taxpayers, we need to be sure that there is a mechanism to catch outlying bills. The anomaly was sent for review by the various bureaucrats at OHIP, which was also appropriate.What went wrong?Basically, everything after that. The OHIP bureaucrats reviewed the situation. As pointed out by Perry Brodkin (OHIPs former lawyer, who was quoted extensively in the Kingstonist) the information was sent “up the hierarchy” and would have reached the deputy health minister and minister.The bureaucrats and health minister decided she didn’t qualify for the codes. The reasons given (see the Kingstonist articles for more details) change at a whim. First it was that the clinic was outdoors not inside (you mean at a time when we are all social distancing, we should have crammed unrelated people into a clinic to immunize them?). Then it was that medical students were used (despite the strong endorsement of using medical students by the then-dean of Queen’s University Medical School, Dr. Jane Philpott). Then it was that she paid people to work there.Then things got uglyAnd finally, after repeated questioning by the Kingsonist, things got really ugly when Hannah Jensen, the communications director for the minister of health, issues a statement alleging that Dr. Ma “pocketed” the funds. This basically amounted to an allegation of theft by Dr. Ma and was widely viewed as a disgusting, immoral and reprehensible comment in the medical community. Even the Kingstonist was alarmed by this and called the statement “rife with allegations.”Why this offends doctors so muchLet’s be clear about this. There is zero tolerance in the broader medical community for misappropriation of funds/intentional fraudulent OHIP billing. Zilch. Nada. But there is a recognition that the imperfect OHIP billing schedule needs to be interpreted with reason, especially when times are unreasonable. And what could possibly be a more unreasonable time than a once in a lifetime pandemic?Dr. Ma did all the work to meet the billing criteria (even the OHIP bureaucrats were forced to admit that yes, more than 35,000 shots were given, and she had planned and organized the whole thing). The fact that she did it outside and had medical students help when some 20-year-old pre-pandemic memos said not to is an unwarranted use of a technicality.For many physicians, this brings back memories of when another set of bureaucrats persecuted physicians. They even told one pediatric respirologist that in order to bill a code, he had to perform rectal and pelvic exams on children!What does this mean for Ontario healthcare?First, as Dr. Ma herself pointed out, it is now illegal for physicians to bill any procedures that they delegated to medical students. This means that medical teaching will effectively grind to a halt. Why would any doctor teach a medical student to say, suture a wound, when that doctor would now be financially penalized?Second, this story has made the national press. It has also been reported in Canadian journals that cater to physicians and other healthcare workers. The message to them is clear: Do NOT think of relocating/starting up a practice in Ontario. You will be treated grossly unfairly by the bureaucrats and health minister and there will be no reasonable interpretation of the rules.What can be done?According to Brodkin, Health Minister Sylvia Jones and Premier Doug Ford can direct OHIP to disregard the HSARB ruling. They need to do so immediately. However, because politicians only think of re-election, and not what is right, Dr. Ramsey Hijazi, the founder of the Ontario Union of Family Physicians wants to up the pressure on them.His group has set up a petition that clearly demands that justice be done in this case. It demands that the minister and premier disregard the HSARB ruling. We need to support our healthcare heroes, not penalize them on technicalities in outdated bulletins.I urge all of my followers to sign the petition. If this case is allowed to go on, trust me on this, there will be negative consequences for healthcare in Ontario, and we don’t need any more of those.Dr. Sohail Gandhi is a former president of the OMA and opinions are his and not necessarily the opinions of the OMA Board. This article is a reprint from his blog site: justanoldcountrydoctor.com.

The Dr. Elaine Ma case is proof that Ontario is unfriendly to physicians

Register for free access or login.

Related Topics